Bush And Blair Set The Date Straight?
Tony Blair has travelled to Washington to talk to George Bush about the 'withdrawal' of troops from Iraq but are they going to set a date ?
Yesterday Tony Blair travelled to the political city of Washington to visit George Bush over the situation of Iraq , and as officials have called talks also over the withdrawal of troops from Iraq completely, the time at the pressure is increasing for the polictical world for Blair and Bush to give the world a date for the U.K and U.S's withdrawal plan , but will they keep to it.
The prime minister was defended regualarly by the president saying that 'Not once has the prime minister called me to discuss the negatives of Iraq'
But back here in the U.K the prime minister does not have his american buddie to back him up and defend him, Tony Blair is the perverbal lamp walking to its slaughter, because politians have showed the prime minister no mercy on the situation at hand.
The shadow foreign secretary William Hague added to this slaughter of the prime minister's decisions accusing him of being 'rude' to britains american allies and indicating of how he will not collect his congressional medal, but to refuse this decision the foreign secretary pounced on this trail of bad scent that the prime minister had left saying it was 'rude' of him to accept the honour but then refuse it.
But the prime minister is trying his hardest to stay in the publics politcal good books by keeping at the defence of the new baghdad government with plees of fiancial and techincal support.
Also to add to this politcal defense the white house spokesman Tony Snow commented on
how he does 'not believe that you're going to hear the president of the prime minister say we're going to be out in one year two years, four years- I just dont think you're going to get any specific prediction of troops withdrawals'.
Well from it looks like at the present the future revealing of the Iraq pullout is looking bleaker and bleaker for the public knowledge as both parties continue to back each other up on the matter at hand so at the moment Iraq on the politcal white board still remains a question mark, or does it ?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The prime minister was defended regualarly by the president saying that 'Not once has the prime minister called me to discuss the negatives of Iraq'
But back here in the U.K the prime minister does not have his american buddie to back him up and defend him, Tony Blair is the perverbal lamp walking to its slaughter, because politians have showed the prime minister no mercy on the situation at hand.
The shadow foreign secretary William Hague added to this slaughter of the prime minister's decisions accusing him of being 'rude' to britains american allies and indicating of how he will not collect his congressional medal, but to refuse this decision the foreign secretary pounced on this trail of bad scent that the prime minister had left saying it was 'rude' of him to accept the honour but then refuse it.
But the prime minister is trying his hardest to stay in the publics politcal good books by keeping at the defence of the new baghdad government with plees of fiancial and techincal support.
Also to add to this politcal defense the white house spokesman Tony Snow commented on
how he does 'not believe that you're going to hear the president of the prime minister say we're going to be out in one year two years, four years- I just dont think you're going to get any specific prediction of troops withdrawals'.
Well from it looks like at the present the future revealing of the Iraq pullout is looking bleaker and bleaker for the public knowledge as both parties continue to back each other up on the matter at hand so at the moment Iraq on the politcal white board still remains a question mark, or does it ?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++